Notifications
29 may 2026
Налоговый мониторинг: вопросы, при использовании сценариев информационного обмена
Команда «ФБК Право» продолжает серию постов, освещающих самые актуаль...
26 may 2026
Радио РБК. Если непогода стала причиной опоздания на работу
Если непогода помешала добраться до работы, вы не одиноки. Узнайте, в...
25 may 2026
Верховный Суд систематизировал позиции о значении кода ОКОФ в качестве критерия признания имущества объектом обложения налогом на имущество
Команда «ФБК Право» подготовила разбор Тематического обзора Верховног...
22 may 2026
Застройщики просят снизить налог на участки для индивидуального жилищного строительства
Как пишет Коммерсантъ, после повышения ставки земельного налога с 0,3...
20 may 2026
Проекта приказа «Об утверждении Требований к информационным системам организации, к которым предоставляется доступ налоговым органам»
Команда «ФБК Право» подготовила обзор проекта Приказа «Об утверждении...
19 may 2026
Кассация: вознаграждение КУ в 30% от субсидиарки включают оплату юристов
Как пишет «PROбанкротство», кассация указала, что стимулирующее возна...
18 may 2026
«ФБК Право» — партнёр конкурса «The DEPARTMENT. Лучшие юридические департаменты России»
Юридическая фирма «ФБК Право» второй год подряд выступает партнёром к...
24 may 2024
ФБК Legal на заседании Комитета по налогам и финансам CCI France Russie
Управляющий партнер ФБК Legal Алексей Нестеренко выступил на заседани...
Ru

Marketplaces Save on Taxes Through Agency Model

12 February 2026

According to Pravo.ru, marketplaces are not infrequently criticised for allegedly reducing their tax burden by using an agency model. However, this perspective overlooks the actual structure of tax payments in e-commerce. Experts point out that when assessing the tax contribution of e-commerce, the taxes paid not only by the platforms themselves should be considered but also those paid by sellers. Selling goods through a marketplace does not remove transactions from the fiscal framework. The seller pays taxes on the full value of the goods sold, while the platform pays taxes on its commission income and the services it provides. As a result, the tax burden is distributed among the participants in the chain, rather than disappearing altogether.

FBK Legal Director Maria Semenova goes into more detail:

‘The tax burden is calculated as the ratio of taxes paid to an entity's income as reported in its statement of financial results—excluding dividends, personal income tax, and insurance premiums. This is the approach recommended by the Federal Tax Service and is used as an indicator of tax compliance.

The use of an agency model does alter the structure of a company's income and the timing of tax liabilities. Under an intermediary model, the tax base of a marketplace is established from its agency fees and income from the services it provides, such as logistics, IT, advertising, and others. This financial result is what is used to calculate VAT and income tax. Therefore, when commission and service income margins are high, the tax burden on the digital platform remains substantial and cannot be reduced simply by virtue of the agency structure itself.

Legislation does not tie the availability of special tax regimes to a specific business model—whether direct sales to end customers or interaction with end customers through intermediaries, including marketplaces. The key factors that determine eligibility for special tax regimes are the level of income, the book value of fixed assets, the average number of employees, the percentage of equity held by other entities in the taxpayer's capital, and the type of activity. Accordingly, the choice of sales channel is neutral with regard to the ability to apply the simplified tax system.’

Subscribe to our news
Get the best news in a weekly email
be22
1
7
2
8
5
Benchmark litigation
6
3
Forbes
4